Showing posts with label underwear. Show all posts
Showing posts with label underwear. Show all posts

Review: "Redwoods" is a Gay Romance That's Worth Getting Lost In

Two people weary from life meet unexpectedly and, even though they only know each other for a couple of days, discover a mind-blowing love that Changes Everything. But one of them has unbreakable commitments elsewhere — forcing him to ask, "Do I dare pursue this mind-blowing love, even if it means hurting other people?"

It's the plot of Bridges of Madison County and Nights in Rodanthe, right?

It's also the basic plot of a charming new gay movie, Redwoods, released last month on DVD.

Everett feels stifled with Miles, the man with whom he is raising an autistic son. But then Miles and their son go away for a week, and Everett meets Chase, a traveling novelist in town to research a book.

And so begins a brief, bittersweet love affair that will echo throughout the ages.

Look, if you simply can't buy this premise of "soul-mates," of love-at-first-sight, you won't like this movie. And truthfully? I don't buy this premise either, not in real life, where I think "infatuation" is completely different from "true love," which is something that grows slowly over time.

But for some reason, I can suspend my disbelief long enough to buy it on movie screens — or at least I bought it here — even despite a wildly over-the-top ending. This is a fantasy, pure and simple, and it is exactly as ridiculous as the two movies I mentioned above.

It helps that the two leads, Matthew Montgomery (Chase) and Brendan Bradley (Everett), do a wonderful job of selling all this. Bradley, who is reportedly straight in real life, has an appealingly vulnerable quality to him — exactly what the role requires. And Montgomery, who is openly gay and well-known in indie gay film, is certainly my idea of a handsome stranger who would force me to Question Everything.

Brendan Bradley and Matthew Montgomery

Keep in mind that Redwoods is a micro-budget indie gay movie, surely made on a shoestring. As such, the synth-heavy music is occasionally distracting, the story flags for a bit, and the dialogue is sometimes a little clunky (especially toward the end when they discuss Chase's novel their relationship).

That said, this is night-and-day better than most similarly-budgeted projects: the script is solid, the acting is remarkably good (and consistent; unlike a lot of these micro-budget movies, there are no painfully wooden supporting players). And — I know this sounds like a small thing, but it's not — the lighting, which is so often "off" in these indie gay movies, looks professionally done.

Better still, the movie takes great advantage of the redwood forests where it is set. Too many low-budget movies are set in the front room of the director's house, and they feel weirdly claustrophobic. This movie took the exact opposite approach — small budget, but big scope — and it absolutely paid off.

Mostly, I appreciate that, more and more, we live in an age where gay movies don't have to always be angsty and depressing, or preachy and pointed. There are no closeted boyfriends in Redwoods, no disapproving parents to come out to.

This a pure cheese, a frothy romance — a gay guilty pleasure! And in my book, that makes this the most revolutionary gay film I've seen in quite some time.

http://www.afterelton.com

Ultra Nate - Automatic

Ultra Nate - Automatic
I like this video...

“Eating Out 3” Makes for a Mostly Unsatisfying Meal

A movie franchise is like a shark. For it to stay alive, it has to move forward. It’s a lesson that the Eating Out franchise would do well to learn.

I liked 2004’s Eating Out a lot. The campy gay sex farce was downright revolutionary coming after decades of earnest, angsty coming out dramas (and two years before Another Gay Movie).

2006’s Eating Out 2: Sloppy Seconds wasn’t as successful, but it wasn’t a disaster.

But Eating Out 3: All You Can Eat, now playing in limited release, is the weakest entry in the series so far. It’s not that parts of it aren’t funny. It’s just that the movie takes absolutely no chances, choosing instead to change a few details and repeat what came before in the first two movies.

Q. Allan Brocka, the creator of Logo’s Rick & Steve the Happiest Gay Couple in all the World and writer and director of Eating Out and the producer of Eating Out 2, doesn’t appear to have been involved at all this time around, and it shows.

The movie quickly kills off the main character from the first two movies, Kyle (American Idol’s Jim Verraros), replacing him with Casey (Daniel Skelton), a wide-eyed gay innocent who takes one look at the slutty things going on during the opening credits and says, “I’m gonna love this town!”

Rebekah Kochan is back as the foul-mouthed Tiffani – “the slut with the mouth of shit.”

Casey and Rebekah team up and soon meet the sizzling hot Zack (Chris Salvatore), smarting over having just been dumped by his boyfriend, Lionel (The Janice Dickinson’s Modeling Agency’s John Stallings).

John Stallings (center)

Casey thinks Zack is out of his league, but Rebekah talks him into inventing a fake online profile, using photos of her hot ex, Ryan, under the (accurate) assumption that people are often more honest with strangers than they are with people they know.

Naturally, Zack falls in love with the non-existent guy who has Casey’s personality but who looks like Ryan. Then the real Ryan turns up back in town and, well, complications ensue.

It’s a clever premise, and there are some nice moments along the way. Daniel Skelton has a goofy, appealing charm, and Leslie Jordan has a nice cameo where he warns that “having sex with someone else to get over a break-up never works. Never.”

Leslie Jordan (left) and Mink Stole

There’re plenty of funny, and well-deserved, pokes at the gay community, as when a character logs online and is instantly bombarded with dozens of people wanting to “PNP!” Indeed, the film’s satire of the gay community’s online hook-up culture is the best part of the film.

And when clueless, self-centered Rebekah doesn’t know what “LGBT” means or how to pronounce “Matthew Shepard,” it’s hard not to laugh.

Still, too many jokes fall flat. Rebekah singing “Cum-baya” at a funeral instead of “Kumbaya” (“someone’s horny my Lord, cum-baya…”) was just sort of embarrassing. And the line “Blow job for your thoughts?” probably read funnier on the page.

Basically, the film suffers from Bad Gay Film-itis: uneven pacing, sometimes wooden acting even in the lead roles, and waaaaay too much talking.

In fact, the movie makes a big mistake by wrapping its “mistaken identity” storyline up too quickly. This results in a long middle section where the characters … talk.

And talk and talk and talk.

Then after another pivotal plot point, there’s still more talking. Not even two scenes of full-frontal male nudity can make all this talk not seem boring.

Chris Salvatore (left) and Daniel Skelton

But the biggest problem may be that we’ve seen this movie before, in the first two entries. There’s even one scene where Rebekah tries to get straight-guy Ryan turned on enough to have sex with guys that’s virtually the same as happened in Eating Out. This might have been intended as an homage, but it comes across as a repeat.

There is a fresh and funny sex comedy to be made in 2009. This isn’t it.

Watch the teaser trailer for Eating Out 3:



http://www.afterelton.com

New David Beckham Ad

David Beckham appears luscious in a new underwear ad from Emporio Armani.

Here he is a little “larger” :)

DAVID GANDY MESSO A NUDO DA DOLCE&GABBANA

Scritto da Valerio
lunedì 14 gennaio 2008

fonte: www.gay.tv

(11/01/2008) In anteprima assoluta gli scatti del calendario 2008 dei due stilisti con protagonista il modello inglese: la perfezione assoluta e ideale di una statua greca nelle foto black&white by Mariano Vivanco. GALLERY >

Inglese doc anche se la sua pelle profuma di sapori mediterranei e i suoi occhi hanno lo stesso colore del mare di Sicilia: a David Gandy sono bastati un costume bianco semi trasparente indossati per 30 secondi nello spot della fragranza Light Blue Dolce&Gabbana per turbare la nostra estate 2007.
Ora David è testimonial per la linea underwear dei due stilisti, sfilerà per loro in esclusiva a Milano Moda uomo sabato 12 gennaio ed è protagonista del calendario 2008 Dolce&Gabbana fotografato da Mariano Vivanco.
GAY.tv vi regala in anteprima assoluta gli strepitosi scatti rigorosamente in black&white di un dio dal corpo tornito e perfetto, degno erede dell'arte statuaria della Grecia classica. Per Dolce&Gabbana l'uomo è lui: DAVID!

David Gandy presenterà la nuova linea underwear domenica 13 gennaio, al primo piano de La Rinascente Duomo di Milano, nello spazio riservato a Dolce & Gabbana Underwear.



redazione@gay.tv

COLTO CON LE MANI SUL PACCO, CONDANNATO A 200 EURO DI MULTA

Da oggi in poi la classicata `palpatina` ai genitali sarà considerata reato. Lo ha stabilito la Corte di Cassazione condannando un operaio che "sulla pubblica via si toccava vistosamente i genitali".

Un operaio in tuta da lavoro che si mette le mani sul pacco per una sistematina: esiste nulla di più eccitante per un essere umano sessualmente attratto degli uomini? No. Checchè se ne dica, la classica 'palpatina' scatena sempre un irrefrenabile istinto voyeuristico.

Bene, da oggi possiamo scordarcela. Con la sentenza 8389 la Corte di Cassazione ha confermato 200 euro di multa (e 1000 di ammenda) nei confronti di un operaio comasco che "sulla pubblica via si toccava vistosamente i genitali (da sopra i vestiti)". L'uomo era stato condannato dal tribunale di Como l'11 maggio dello scorso anno. Contro questa decisione ha fatto ricorso in Cassazione sostenendo che il gesto da lui "effettuato, equiparato a un grattamento, non era nient'altro che un movimento compulsivo e involontario, probabilmente finalizzato alla sistemazione della tuta da lavoro".

Il ricorso non è stato però accolto dalla terza sezione penale della Suprema corte, secondo la quale "il palpeggiamento dei genitali davanti ad altri soggetti, in quanto manifestazione di mancanza di costumatezza ed educazione, deve considerarsi atto contrario alla pubblica decenza, concetto comprensivo di quel complesso di regole comportamentali etico-sociali che impongono a ciascuno di astenersi da condotte potenzialmente offensive del sentimento collettivo della compostezza del decoro, generanti disagio, disgusto e disapprovazione nell'uomo medio". Sono considerate indecenti anche le palpatine scaramantiche.

Una cosa è certa: nel nostro paese c'è un bizzarro concetto di 'decenza'. E anche un'altra: alla Corte di Cassazione hanno un sacco di tempo libero.

redazione@gay.tv

1